Talk:Yerba mate
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that one or more audio files demonstrating correct pronunciation of this article's title be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Argentina is now largest producer
[edit]Currently Argentina is the world's largest producer of yerba mate, surpassing its neighbors Brazil and Paraguay.
https://yerbamateargentina.org.ar/es/el-mate-en-el-mundo.html... --201.139.81.229 (talk) 14:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)]]
Images are too centered on Southern South America consumption habits
[edit]Iced mate is widely consumed in Rio de Janeiro, and the industrial version has been purchased by Coca Cola. It's not a minor fact.
"Caffeine / Mateine" citation needs a better reference
[edit]Right now, the citation is to an incidental reference in a random journal article from "Medical Problems in Dentistry".
It might be correct, but that's not very strong supporting evidence. Matthew Miller (talk) 23:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Review
[edit]I agree with Skywatcher68. This is likely a good review to add. Invasive Spices (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Sources that may not be reliable
[edit]There is a 2011 template indicating some sources may not be reliable. Those who know please indicate whose those are so we can improve the article. Pumallku (talk) 06:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Weak, non-MEDRS sources on weight loss
[edit]This revert was justified because the caffeine content review doesn't address weight loss and the other source is unreliable primary research having used only 14 subjects. WP:MEDRS sources would be needed for the proposed content, as the edit summary stated. Zefr (talk) 06:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- It was not justified, at most a mild rewording could be done. Per WP:MEDRS itself states "Ideal sources for biomedical information include: review articles (especially systematic reviews) published in reputable medical journals" which the journals Nutrients and Journal of Food Science pass, also the Lutomski, P., Gozdziewska, M., & Florek-Luszczki, M. (2020). Health properties of yerba mate. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 27(2). confirms health benefits . Pumallku (talk) 07:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Nutrients is an MDPI journal suspected of predatory publishing, and is not reliable for medical content; the report was also primary research with a poor experimental design (n=14). The Journal of Food Science and Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine are obviously not reliable sources for medical content or health effects. Zefr (talk) 07:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Everyday life
- C-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- C-Class plant articles
- High-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- C-Class South America articles
- Mid-importance South America articles
- C-Class Argentine articles
- Mid-importance Argentine articles
- WikiProject Argentina articles
- C-Class Bolivia articles
- Low-importance Bolivia articles
- WikiProject Bolivia articles
- C-Class Brazil articles
- Mid-importance Brazil articles
- WikiProject Brazil articles
- C-Class Chile articles
- Low-importance Chile articles
- WikiProject Chile articles
- C-Class Paraguay articles
- Mid-importance Paraguay articles
- WikiProject Paraguay articles
- C-Class Uruguay articles
- Mid-importance Uruguay articles
- WikiProject Uruguay articles
- WikiProject South America articles
- C-Class Food and drink articles
- Low-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Wikipedia requested audio of pronunciations