This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change “Mormonism” to “The church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints”
Because, it is not the correct name of the religion being discussed. In fact mormonism is not a religion at all and there is none that goes by that name, it is just a nickname.
And secondly we are Christian so you could opt to add “LDS Christians” — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.130.23.114 (talk) 22:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:CITEVAR it's best to have a unified citation style on an article. Since the vast majority (50+ sources) on this article use "cite x" format, and the remaining 6 primary sources mostly from the 1800s are in "harv" format and listed under the "References" section, is there any objections to moving those last remaining sources to the principal citation style of this article? Alternatively, doing the reverse to 50+ sources sounds wayy more tedious to me, but if someone feels very strongly they can propose to do that themselves. Any objections? Pastelitodepapa (talk) 08:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)